The multi-billion dollar global rideshare company Uber has lost a landmark appeal against a New Zealand Court, which has ruled that drivers should be treated as employees not contractors.
In 2022 the Employment Court made a historic ruling against Uber, when four Uber drivers were granted workplace protection.
This gave the drivers employee benefits such as leave entitlements, minimum wage and holiday pay.
Uber appealed against the decision in June 2023, but today the court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favour of the drivers.
Nurredin Abdurahman, one of the four drivers who took the original court case, said the decision is a hopeful one.
"This is a win for all working people," Mr Abdurahman said. "The day of corporates like Uber exploiting NZ workers is coming to an end!"
"I'm grateful to the legal system for identifying an injustice to the working class and examining it properly. I'm extremely happy - this will make a huge difference at a time where Uber drivers are still being mistreated by the company."
The decision applies to the four drivers who took the case against Uber, but could set a precedent for other contractors who work in the gig economy.
However, in June this year the Workplace Relations and Safety Minister, Brooke van Velden, began working on law changes that could prevent workers misclassified as contractors from challenging their employment status in the courts.
FIRST Union and E tū Union are now calling for the minister to immediately drop her expedited plans.
The Labour Party is celebrating the Court of Appeal's decision, saying Uber drivers should be treated fairly like all workers, and they deserved to be heard and be protected by law.
"Currently regarded as contractors by Uber, this court decision means that drivers will be recognised as employees and have the employment rights they have always deserved. This a victory for workers and shows the law works as it should," said Labour workplace relations spokesperson Camilla Belich.
Labour is backing the Unions in their effort to halt Minister Brooke van Velden's law changes.
"Should Brooke Van Velden choose to continue her backward battle, she would see to take away rights recognised by the Court today by applying the law and common sense," Belich said.
"The minister should reject her ideologically focused attacks on workers' rights. In light of this decision, her contractor law reform work needs to be ditched."
ISSUE
